>>16464301Also aside from you being a retarded redditoid.
1) He (
>>16464295) admitted he didn't want an explanation
>Don't botherWhy address logic to someone who doesn't want an answer?
btw that is a serious question, I want an answer.
2) I WAS willing to address his post with basic logic, that is why I asked in the very post you cite (
>>16464288)
>do you want me to actually address that pic you posted. 3) Do you want an answer or would you prefer to remain a faggot?
also pls respond quick cause I got a mountain to climb so I can't sit at my PC all day.
