>>22364931>no thats ok. speaking of disgusting fetish faggots...Here, I made this just because you told me not to.
>>22364962All this reminds me, I've been meaning to ask this thread. Does that hold for those covered-call funds too? JEPI and so on. I know that's a different thing since they're trying to farm income instead of leverage the returns but I thought any ETF that writes options on some underlying thing tends to inherently go down in value over time because of the cost or rolling over option positions. Like, I assume it'd be a lot less for an income fund, as opposed to "every day", but still.