>>9495636The process you described sounds like an SQL Injection exploit. If they left their election counting SQL servers open to THAT trivial of an attack, FROM THE INTERNET, then they are either COMPLETE FUCKING MORONS, or DELIBERATELY TRYING TO FUCK WITH THE RESULTS.
In EITHER case, they're better off HAND COUNTING PAPER BALLOTS. Which is how EVERYONE should do it. With _ONLY_ trusted people using a TRUSTED system of LOCKED BOXES and MULTIPLE SIGNATURES on each end of transport.
This way you can't just "find" a bunch of ballots...
