>>10557379>>10557383>Controlling for age and gender, individuals with tattoos were more likely to smoke, drink heavily, use smokeless tobacco, and ride in a vehicle with someone who had been drinking than non-tattooed individuals. Idk, they sound like they're not pussies at the very least. Also, your sample size is 550 military recruits. Your study sucks, and so do you, but please continue to administer purity tests that you can't pass.
>inb4 I don't have tattoosFine and dandy. But the reason you don't like them is because you view them as a pollutant to the body. SO, can you tell me without a shadow of doubt that you have never ever let any pollutants into your body? No carcinogenic food dyes? No BPAs? No xenoestrogenic plastic coumpounds? How about heavy metals? Damage from LTE? What about sun screen? Did you remember your UV protection?
The most balanced response is that no one wants a nanny-state to impose ridiculous arbitrary standards, and they are arbitrary because the person is not harming anyone else in the process. You just want to remove liberties for the sake of removing them. Even Hitler recognized the importance of individualism. Do you think the Gestapo was breaking down doors to stop little old ladies from smoking? Gtfoh
