>>16217526>. just start it as MIT licensed, then it cant be changedLicenses are revokable from free-takes.
Yes it can be changed by the copyright holder afterwards.
It's not often done but
"it can't be changed" is wrong
t. lawyer.
And yes all the opensource people will scream otherwise while supporting women's rights, CoC's, and trannies.
>("[N]onexclusive licenses are revocable absent consideration."). Where consideration is present, however, the license is irrevocable, and "[t]his is so because a nonexclusive license supported by consideration is a contract. Lulirama Ltd. v. Axcess Broad. Servs., Inc., 128 F.3d 872, 882 (5th Cir. 1997); see also Carson v. Dynegy, Inc., 344 F.3d 446, 451 (5th Cir. 2003).MIT is a non-exclusive license that is not supported by consideration ( you didn't pay anything for it: the main draw of opensource: it's free)
