>>18499361That's not your image. Do you expect me to believe you just took a picture and renamed it "119.jpg"?
You just played yourself.
>are you denying... soda shillYou are asserting it. The burden of proof is on you. Are you denying you're a low level paid disinfo shill? Ironically you did just provide me with circumstancial proof.
>disproven physicsSo use your knowledge of high school physics to disprove one instead of making up stories about baking soda.
You can start with the impossible photographs that are spot lit and not lit by the sun.
Maybe you should actually watch the video instead of repeating talking points.
Still no source
