>>2458812As
>>2458826 said
But seriously, you think everyone is an atheist because they don't believe in your HIM?
Why not a HER? Why just a HIM and not them both? Is the best family ideology just a HIM? Is one father enough?
Why not two HIMs? Why not two HERs? Why not two APACHE HELICOPTERS?
Why stop there? Why not six XENOMORPHS and a CHUPLUPACOBRA?
Where does your line begin, and where does it end? And why is your line so definitively defined if you're willing to accept outside theory?