>>17788162I'll give you a (You), it didn't occur to me not to. You and
>>17788158 seem to think you're "manipulating" people and winning some "battle" by posting this thread and then when people respond you're tactically-not-responding and playing "mental chess" with them and shit in you thinking you're making them "feel" through how they respond or something. I get what's going on now. I've seen like middle schoolers and Indians do this type of thing. You're all just neurotic. Women do this with men when they "shit test" them, where they ignore them for a reaction, or try to game their reactions to their behavior by doing certain things.
Most of the people ITT myself included suspected this was you wanting attention, but it appears it is somehow even more funny, you're making an attempt to like "play" the people responding by doing sort of "charades" with your wordplay. Most normal people can't even imagine that you're being this retarded, congratulations. It's either that, or you've talked yourself into a corner and somehow claiming this was your motive is the more preferable option, or something maybe. Hell, who knows, I have no idea what you're talking about anymore. Again, I don't get this thread.
