>>13156196first part of your pic is from ger-turk anon
second part which you cut to pieces and "attempted" to incorporate as further proof is from old commie/lgbt raid
you don't need to be an oldfag to recognize those two
the sheer fact that you are attempting to use well known /pol/ pic material in the dishonest manner tells everything one needs to know about your intentions
seriously faggot, what did you expect when you produced this image?