>>8193917i was telling norway that i'm nearly certain that they went very far out of their way to make sure the audio was as bad as it could get for everything other than sound quality
most of it was manageable but what was by far the worst was a section where the audio quality changed entirely for a ~12 word exchange between 2 people in a way that didn't logically follow any of the previous narration or following conversation so it was literally impossible to tell whether it was 2 different people making an aside like in ads or the same two people as the next scene in a spot with different acoustics/a different mic
