>>17269016When it comes to Building 7, this is a pdf that will download, it proves the building fell at freefall:
https://www.europhysicsnews.org/articles/epn/pdf/2016/04/epn2016474p21.pdfIt's simply impossible for a building to fall evenly at freefall speeds like that unless all support beams were cut at the same time, which completely contradicts the fire and gravity collapse narrative pushed by NIST, who surprisingly won't release their files.
There's tons of sources on the 2.4 seconds of freefall. If you don't like these you can simply perform the calculations yourself with the many videos out there. This isn't debatable.
Here's one out of many:
https://www.ae911truth.org/evidence/free-fall-accelerationThis is another .pdf that may interest you:
https://www.nist.gov/document/ae911truth-nist-written-submission12-18-07pdfShills cannot explan the collapse of WTC 7. All they have is bluster, insults, and ridiculous nonsense. I've heard it all before.
The truth is, the building "knew too much, as this article says". It contained many files on ongoing financial investigations, the whole thing was a money laundering operation.
https://nymag.com/news/9-11/10th-anniversary/building-seven/So, can anyone explain how the BBC reported the collapse almost 30 minutes early? Are they psychic? Prophets, perhaps? Is it just a "coincidence"?
https://fullfact.org/online/bbc-world-trade-center-7-september-11/ 