>>10681562>Stupid people don't get to make the rules for stupid reasons, especially stupid people without even any authority whatsoever.>Light eyes are not exclusive to Europe. People throughout North Africa and Eurasia can have them too though much rarer.>Brown eyes are literally native too. Can't make a trait only a fraction of the population has the defining one, especially when it isn't even exclusive.>Brown eyes can even look better on some people than blue eyes, though that's as subjective as the appeal of blue eyes.>Imagine defining people by a singular trait as insignificant as eye color that in no way defines what is essential to us.CONCLUSION: ALL LIFE SHARES A COMMON ORIGIN AND SO PORTIONS OF THEIR GENES, SO TAXONOMIC IDENTITY CANNOT BE DEFINED BY THE ABSENCE OF SHARED GENES WITH OTHER TAXONOMIC GROUPS, BUT BY THE OVERALL GENETIC HOMOGENEITY AMONG THE MEMBERS OF THE GROUP. ALL EUROPEANS ARE THE FUSION OF THE SAME THREE ANCESTRAL POPULATIONS: YAMNAYA, WHG, AND NEOLITHIC FARMER. THEREFORE, MODERN EUROPEANS ARE (ALMOST) ALL ROUGHLY HOMOGENEOUS AND SO ROUGHLY RACIALLY/TAXONOMICALLY "PURE." EUROPEAN IS NOT X TRAIT. THE ENTIRE BODY OF THE EUROPEAN BLOOD IS ITS OWN DEFINITION.
This is the best solution you're going to find, but as per the first point, this still has to be formalized.
