>>11997097>Constitutional crisis unfoldingIt's about time; It's long overdue.
~~~~~
>No truth can be based upon that understandable thoughtThe thought *does* exist that "everyone that comes to you, lies to you".
The statement postulates that "no truth can be based upon that understandable thought", however, as we are talking about "thoughts"-- which are "considerations open to interpretations"--couldn't that statement also be interpreted as
>"everyone that comes to you MIGHT JUST be lying to you"...irrevocably allowing TRUTH to be discerned? I will admit that the word "everyone" might appear to negate that, for it predisposes that NO TRUTH can exist if only lies exist...but we absolutely know that truth DOES exist. It just doesn't exist within that judicial construct, just as we can see it doesn't exist within the political sphere that supports its fallacy, as well as the media who insures truth will not emerge, so that ONLY its lies will be believed.
~~~~
There also exists this very simple fact--not a thought-- that "the very construct of a system that's built upon lies" is, in fact, TRUTH; it's their truth. Their truth IS lies.
>That said--and based upon THAT unfortunate fact--it becomes easier for us to immediately consider that the opposite of that they state is a reasonable possibility. >No truth can be based upon that understandable thoughtPerhaps that sentence should be read: "NO TRUTH" *can* be based upon that understandable thought...for only lies exist within it. It's a poorly constructed sentence, yet, easily recognizable.
(apologies for the unavoidable brainstorm that fell upon my psyche after reading your compelling post. I was simply think-posting.)
Kudos for exercising my mind this morning. lol
