>>15224593I did and it neither wholly refutes nor wholly substantiates your initial claim. it also does not even cover numerous other factors related to the subject of health and longevity.
Also it's a meta-analysis and i don't have time to go through every animal study it cited.
go on and tell me more about how I don't understand the scientific method (which I guess is required in order to read papers where you're from?) bonus points if you tell me that the science is settled.
