>>3829030>isn't derived from empirical data>or crude sensory perception> it must be consonant with divinely created reasonIt's just hilarious how you keep restating that logic and reason don't enter into it, you keep restating that there's a "jump", there's "faith", there's the presupposition of something "divine" required.
But somehow you think you're making the opposite point. It's like you're dressed up in full clerical garb about ready to tell us exactly which denomination of Christianity is 100% correct, but first you just want to sell us on the idea that all the bullshit you're about to say was based on science.
Just accept that you're just religious like the rest of them. The fact that you have to portray it like you're not "just" a person of faith shows how you're just insecure about what you believe.
>An anthropomorphic Zeus is of no value ethically, spiritually, rationally or empirically. But there is a reason that many peoples abandoned their animistic beliefs for the Judeo-Christian ones.In which you openly, finally admit what you're actually trying to sell. Of course you just had to introduce more errors. Of course Zeus and Odin had ethnical and spiritual value, they won out over the prevailing barbarous religions at the time. And now they're irrelevant because we've moved on. Just like your own religion that you're eager to sell us is something we've moved beyond so much you can't even say you believe the Bible in any real sense.
You're just going to tell us it's all about how you, personally, read it, cutting out 90% of the content and making up entirely new ideas that "coincidentally" work with modern secular society.
But you're a person of faith. Sure.
