>>4320620If there was a problem with my result then someone would have cited it by now instead of just typing what you typed thousands of times.
I'm not disgraced at all, if I was you wouldn't be on here trying to sell that story because it would have already been sold. Only after I was denied access to peer review at several journals of the APS, IOP, and AIP, as well as denied access to arXiv did I switch to spamming these other avenues.
YOU (brainlet)
>jealous you couldn't have an idea as good as mine