Quoted By:
What this is:
>This is a movement in order to simply remove all footwear from women, as it would prevent them from going in the workplace, and to encourage them to stay at home and retain the family unit, which is smallest possible unit of national identity. Women's shoe apparel manufacturers artificially created a degenerate culture, founded by (((them))), and ran almost exclusively by homosexual men (who have no interest in women), around the time of the Women's Suffrage Movement, in order to empower women, cripple their feet in unnatural ways, and as a status symbol for degenerate promiscuity. Barefoot women were often looked up to with attraction, and were preferred in the arts and media prior to the 20th century, as it pertains to their natural beauty, submissiveness, and humility, as can be seen today when women would often subconsciously make men want to notice their feet, such as paint their nails, make suggestive movements, and to keep dry or cracking skin from forming.
What this is NOT:
>This is in no way to be confused or mistaken with paraphilia regarding women's feet. This is also not intended to be a short-lived fashion trend, and is not only to be restricted to just young, attractive women. Anything regarding that as such would be considered degenerate, and counteractive to this movement. This is also in no way to be marketed in a way to be monetized in any possible way.
Advantages:
>Women would be kept out of the workplace and workforces, as they were prior to the 20th century, and would have men provide the finances for the sustainability of the family as a whole.
>Women's feet would be healthier and naturally shaped.
>Anti-American (and Anti-Western) women's shoe manufacturers would all go bankrupt, as well as women saving up their money for more meaningful possessions.
>In order to protect women's feet in urban areas, cities would start aggressive ordinances to clean up the sidewalks and streets, thus reducing pollution and disease.
