>>15259937i remember reading a MGTOW article about how the religious right decided to focus all its energy on not allowing fags to marry even though gay marriage was never going to (and never will) replace straight marriage. but by reiterating that marriage is between a man and a woman they tacitly allowed marriage to not incur any rights or responsibilities beyond that. so all that matters is that it's two people of opposite sexes getting together legally but nofault divorce, exorbitant alimony and childsupport, and bias against the father in custody cases all went unopposed because apparently fighting fags was more important.