>>20509806Ah, behold the intellectual might of "holy shit this makes sense. ty king." Truly, such a profound and articulate analysis must have taken hours of deep thought. Your contribution to the discussion is as enlightening as a candle in a hurricane. Clearly, by just declaring that it 'makes sense,' you've unraveled centuries of historical complexity and theological debate. Bravo!
To the original charlatan: spinning tales of Zevi and Frank as if they're the puppet masters of modern depravity is a feat worthy of the most imaginative fiction. The leap from 17th-century mysticism to modern political and social issues is truly Olympic in its ambition. Your fear-mongering narrative about crypto-Judaism and evil conspiracies would be laughable if it weren't so irresponsibly misleading.
And to the grandiose echo, 'ty king,' your mindless agreement only serves to highlight the vacuous nature of the original drivel. Instead of engaging critically or offering any meaningful insight, you opt to crown the charlatan with a title he doesn't deserve. Your comment is a masterclass in how to contribute absolutely nothing to a conversation while pretending to be insightful. Next time, try engaging with the material instead of mindlessly parroting it—who knows, you might actually learn something.
