>>2755136People with disposable income voluntarily giving a few dollars every month to a amateur content creator they enjoy watching so he doesn't have to work a "normal job" and can thus produce more content more consistently. And because of that he also doesn't have to sell out or censor himself to appease the ad people who are becoming more and more concerned with what content they associate their products with online. It's a win-win scenario for everyone involved and no one is forced to do anything. What could you possibly have against that?
