>>21006973Literally can't prove any of that without using NASA bullshit
You can barely see anything through a telescope, I've looked at planets and stuff and they just look like glowing circles, if anything it looks like I'm looking at something that's in water. Hence why it's the firmament and the waters above and the celestial bodies.
But you can't prove that these things are spheres without using NASA bullshit like "satellites". Even the moon, we only ever see one "face" of the moon, we've never actually witnessed the other side with the naked eye, only through digital eyes, and digital is very easily manipulated. Same with the earth, aside from the dubious experiences of VERY FEW astronauts, even the digital representaitions are just CGI composite images.
It's all fake and it's all gay, I'd have to take NASA at their word that
> the sphere is the natural formation objects assemble themselves into in the universeand I reject that because the only "proof" they have is basically their own word and they're fucking liars. You can't use NASA technology like the hubble telescope to prove NASA is real, because you're taking NASA's word that the hubble telescope is real.
