>>21721338Ok, first of all, Varg is not any kind of ideal, I have disagreed with him plenty of times.
The fact is that you have become warped by trolling on /pol/ and can't tell reality from sarcasm, showing your sub 80 IQ and disjointed understanding of pagans.
Varg would be considered a low-caste, plebeian tribalist in Rome, and he doesn't like Rome or Greece or any of the great empires, which demonstrate a heroic instantiation of virile paganism.
>believing in stats>let me document my heathenry in an official government officeAlready had this argument, Chrigger
