>>12668719>>"bitcoin will end the Fed because... It just will, ok?">lolNotice how he pretends to not see arguments, while he is given them few times daily.
Including literally 3 scrolls above
>>12668714By choosing silver instead of Bitcoin, 5 years ago, you would end up with 98% less value - or, you would have something like +2500% or whatever (e.g. sub 2,000$ -> 60,000$) by doing opposite of what that silverberg says.
This is past performance. Now, future prospects also show Bitcoin and some cryptos have it far better.
Compare total supply limit.
And mining speed.
All this numbers are 1 internet search away.
