>>12227906That makes a lot more sense. I understand the desire to dig deeper and dabble in the esoteric but I just can't see the actual want to explore it. There's been countless books written and historical accounts but none of them cosign the existence of magic. You'd think that with something we've been talking about for millenia there would be more evidence or at the very least one book that can actually teach you how to do a couple of petty tricks or spells.
Why can't we find anything like that though after so many years of research by sages, gurus, wizards, sorcerers and all other manner of people?
>>12227910>go back to the middle agesYou know I think that the simple experiment of proving gravity with 2 different sized balls would be enough for me to convince them that what I say is true unlike today. Trying to get people online to understand the very notion of terminal velocity is always inhibited by the very thing you posted in your image. People want to try to reinvent the wheel instead of just using the wheel to take their cart of logic where it needs to go.
