>>13234083The reason it's harder than X is because I converted imperials to metric then calculated it, to make it harder for myself. Whereas in reality I wouldn't even measure beyond .1 meters
I gave you 320.6 yards and I gave myself 293.1566, solely based on that imperial measurement. If I'd do it on the same "level" it would be 293.2 meters and as for the mile it's just 1, whereas I made it harder for myself by being more precise - I could have just gone with: 1.6 km + 293.2 m
Which would make it 1.8932 km or 1893.2 m
If you want to try it in reverse, you do the conversions from metric to imperial, here:
4 km + 200 m
= 4.2 km
= 4200 m
= 420000 cm
Then give me the answer in
miles (
x.xxx miles),
yards (xxxx.x yards),
feet (xxxxxx')
inches (xxxxxxx')
And then the whole thing combined (e.g. 2 miles 33 yards 12 feet 3 inches)
