>>3268815>>3268814Manlets are ALWAYS the top dogs.
Caesar was like 5'2
Napolean was 5'6
Hitler was 5'8"
The majority of engineers and scientists throughout history were short.
There's an inverse relationship between height and intelligence; the shorter a man is, the smarter he is as he has more brain mass per body weight, meaning more energy and proteins are sent to his neo-cortex as opposed to tall "men" who, due to the square-cubed law, require much more energy to do anything and thus they live shorter lives, are less intelligent, and weaker/take more work to get nice gainz.
The only "advantage" they have is women may be more attracted to them, but if your only value is based on ROASTIES, as opposed to being a leader of MEN (like manlets are) then that just proves how pathetic tall "men" are. "Oh, I only like TALL men" <-- literally how roasties and tall "men" think.
If you're a tall "man" you may as well get a sex change now, you're basically a woman.
And yes, I am a manlet and proud. Manlets are objectively superior.
