>>5172907>>5172908What a nonsense response.
That post is based on the idea that "thought" is a clear cut and well defined concept.
Isn't that what the whole argument is about?
Your argument is so far "a thought is a thought and thoughts are electricity".
At what point does this argument connect with the physical part of the world?
A thought has structure, right? So where does that structure come from within the electrical impulses? God?
