>>14580669As I said, in writing a book, you will need to have a conceptualized idea of your working if you want it to be sensible enough to gain any sort of traction within the community of the readers. Thus it will penetrate deeper into the actual idealizations of the specific worldview the individual writer has. Preceding this are three things, motivational potentiality, patience and preciseness. The individual writer will have to think his concepts of reality through thoroughly enough for them to be put into short idealistic premises, from which he will begin to construct the writing of the whole text. Now this will accomplish two things, exactness of words in the sense that he will be able to shorten the verses into lengths that have their warrant within themselves. In other words put, he won't have moments of "verse not good enough to warrant so much of it". The second thing this accomplishes is that the writer will actually have to follow a train of logical reasoning in his thinking, which I believe most people do not do when they think of a conceptual idea, and therefore they will either abandon the idea, or think it through and perfect it to the point where they can disclose their ideas within the limits of their self preservatory ego. In other words, they will not publish something they do not see fit as logical reasoning, as they will see it as a ridiculous projection from others upon themselves.
