>>22594825The point in this type of discussion is to realise that words which were used in the past may not have had the meaning which we ascribe to them today, etc. For example, "quick" in the King James means "alive", by today's understanding, and if one wanted to point to its use in scripture and say that it means "fast, speedy", then such a person would rightly be denounced as ignorant or intentionally subversive.