>>13411489If it works for a certain cancer group, sure, go for it.
Get the data for a survival curve. If you can demostrate it drags a patient over the five year and ten year mark better than current treatmments, then it will become Best Practice that very day the evidence is presented.
>>13411491You're arguing against yourself now, chap. Think about it.
Nobody is claiming that chemo is a cure. It is a tool to shrink lumps in your system, to be followed up with surgery. Or it's used to shrink metasteses after surgery on the main lump.
Your horse drug is acting like chemotherapy for certain low grade lumps. You know what else does that on a much broader scale? Apricot kernels. Are either going to be a cure for cancer? Nope. But they'll take the edge off of the ones you are prone to if you are genetically unlucky enough to generate them.
