>>23963063yeah, also it could easily be something far less insidious and it just seems that way because of how it was worded and what we know now.
could just be something like moot was in the news and epstein thought he saw an opportunity to trick moot into selling the site cheaply because he was hoping it would blow up like facebook was currently doing.
epstein was a businessman and did a shit ton of networking, there's probably thousands of ppl he met with where nothing fucked up was involved.
>>23963067with who?
