>>22184976Cancer treatment has been completely revolutionized at least twice in the time span you're talking about here so I have no idea what your possible point could be. I have no idea what the individual contributions are of the specific building that's on your nerves for some reason. I feel like most people could agree that public funding for cancer research is a good use of tax funds, do you really feel like the private sector medical industry is better for this?
Anyways what does this have to do with exploding the debt ceiling yet again to give billionaires tax cuts and then pretending like we care about balancing the budget?
