>>11168090>sages in all centuriesThey were all talking about different things and had wildly varying opinions on the matter. Constructing a consensus over centuries and dozens of cultures is retarted.
>But when a great event synchronizes the feelings of millions of people, our network of RNGs becomes subtly structured.What criteria do these great events have? Something interesting is always going on. Or you can find something at least.
What subtle structure is this talking about?
tl;dr
Take your medz schizo.
