Quoted By:
To be a serious contender with globe earth, a flat earth model must provide the following
1) Accurate scales that match with reality. For example, 100 km should equal a fixed value in centimeters on a flat earth.
2) Explanations of every single globe earth phenomena at once. Star movement, eclipses, seasons, everything. Flat earthers change their model to fit the discussion they are in
3) Proof or ways to test the speculative claims about a flat earth. For example, the existence of a dome
Before this, there cannot be a debate. Why are flat earthers unable to match up to basic scientific standards?
