>>19152994>'the Son of the Man'>ὁ υἱὸς τοῦ ἀνθρώπουIt's important to ask, who is THE man? Which particular man are we talking about?
Mark 14:61-62
>But he remained silent and made no answer. Again the high priest asked him, “Are you the Christ, the Son of the Blessed?”>And Jesus said, “I am, and you will see the Son of the Man seated at the right hand of Power, and coming with the clouds of heaven.”Now originally this did not say "Jesus" or "Christ". It said ΙΣ and ΧΣ. These are called nomina sacra abbreviations, and all of the oldest manuscripts use abbreviations without exception. Our understanding that ΙΣ always meant Jesus is not guaranteed.
Now regarding "the Man", this probably refers to Philo's οὐράνιος ἄνθρωπος. He had no name, so it was necessary to refer to him as "the man" or "that man" or "even his man", as in God's man
