>>12665045I'm going to say I can't conceive of a way to measure strength or volume of thought, unless it were done per number of individuals. And then you run into problems because you have to filter out NPCs who giggle afterward and say they just said yes and went along with such a request for concerted effort.
Look into the original research on Loss Aversion, where they found people putting in 3 times more effort or mental force to avoid a perceived loss of say 1 unit, but would only put in 1 amount of effort to realise a gain of 1 unit (or something).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loss_aversion>Ra Material / Law of Oneisn't that the whole, quantum entanglement theory, where particles we can observe are manifestations of objects in other dimensions, and despite individual consciousness, we're all one and part of the same continuous organism that is the universe, etc?
>Seth MaterialWhat's this one?
Overall, what are you trying to achieve, anon?
>>12665030>roses from David AustinThanks for sharing. I noticed in our property, over the last year, it might be other biases making me notice, but i could swear there were trees and shrubs blooming that normally had not.
>>12665065read. although i'm not sure i understand it. i have a thirst for knowledge, and I understand it is it's own curse. but to my understanding, that's not a sin? it is it's own punishment?
>>12665048What can I say? I wrote e-mails to family and they've always been ignored. Have you read Dead internet theory?... also maybe check if any got the email?
>>12665072Can you give advice on fasting? I have heard of great benefits and added mental clarity.
