>>10727786Another stream with more than 100,000 viewers, though no sticky this time:
>>10727722>Are they as cancerous as they say?Eh, depends on the server. Even the few I joined from /r9k/ weren't that bad. The only truly questionable one I was in is Sheep Village. There're both underage and of age people in it, but it's essentially for e-dating. Though it's not explicitly bad, I wouldn't want my kid using it, either.
>wouldn't it have happened already?I don't really know. Doubt it would be much of a problem here, anyway. They'd leak in thru moved threads if it does, but most should leave soon after that.
>speaking of bans, does that ever work?Guess not for us. Yknow, though I've yet to see it happen, I've been told that trips can be b& too. I feel like mine should have been b& already, if it is.
>There is a certain disconnect that the screen provides.True, though like you say, you can never know how you'll react until the thing actually happens. Wonder if it's for better or worse in the long run. I mean I would assume worse, but maybe there's something to be said about lessening the impact.
