>>3094080>She's so much of a capitalist and respective of property rights that she uses those unattended rural food stands.Yes, I know that. But that makes her seem leening even more towards the communism, you see, communism is all about human decency. About people not wanting to steal from each other, not wanting everything for themselves, being ready to share the last slice of bread with a stranger. What she does there is just a good thing to do, she understands that theft is bad and so, even given opportunity, does not steal. Because that's what a decent person does, that's what communists (or you know what, let's say what I, just to be safe) want every person on the world to do eventually. Of course in that state, there would be no money, so she would just take it if she needed it more than the "owner" of those, but on all of the steps inbetween that last one and now, I wouldn't want her to take them just like that. It's a PROCESS. I don't want people to do start doing that just now, because I sadi so. That's what anarchists want. I don't even want this generation or next one to. I want it to just go on throughout generations, centuries, where with each one society would get that one little step closer to the goal.
I am not sure about what is the general consensus on whether would it be acceptable for her to just take those without paying, I am sure that some groupings of liberal capitalists think so though, as, well, it's the seller's fault, isn't it? While, I believe no people with views at least similliar to mine would allow such. Or at least that's what I want to think, as I want to believe that people are reasonable, intelligent and rational.
