>>1809916>You need to be a special sort of moron to spend hours trying to """prove""" that statements can't possibly have any meaning or implications beyond the most direct literal one, or that a statement's meaning has nothing to do with the author's intent.You defended your point that "faggots who fell for the bait" equates to "don't respond to bait threads" (oblivious at the fact that I just responded to one) for the same amount of time.
Can't see how this equates to me being the brainlet. Once again nice mental gymnastics.
