>>12852771that's good then. would be very sad to have done the work and be unsatisfied by it
>>12852772well it's relative like i said. weeekly debut pictures are old to still be posting and definitely to be fawning over, but it's not like 7 months is old for a song no matter how much music they're putting out. there's also a pretty big difference between talking about an all time favorite or a specific artist's discography and bringing this stuff up
when i say something's old i mean that it'd be weird for someone to be posting weeekly debut pics without any context, not that things farther than a few months back should be wiped from our memories
sleep tight
