we now know that silver is not considered a financial asset, is not a reserve asset and is internationally considered a good. from that you can derive that gold, that all the named and very unique properties like no other tangible asset on this planet do have, is a way better overall form of protection as silver is. how do they compare in inflationary times?
since silver has no meaningful, debateable even absolutely zero monetary value in reality at all, domestically and internationally - it doesnt react well to monetary actions. suprise suprise. if you look at the reaction to monetary inflation (expansive money supply - price inflation is the symptom and most of the time the logical consequence of that) you can see picrel that its suboptimal in comparison to gold. the inflation hedge in form of silver is simply subpar. there are no ifs, whats or buts about it.
>picrel >>12733171 timescale is 40+ years when money supply grew from 2 trillion to 20 trillion (both rounded).>over time, gold simply performs better and smoother than silver as inflation hedgeBUY GOLD THE FED GOT NONE
