>>13319951LOL you complete idiot.
Imagine believing the official claim about WTC7!!! The official claim is that the thermal expansion pushed one column out of it’s seat, and then, like a domino, this column magically collapsed the next columns, from the inside out, until it reached the outer columns at PRECISELY AND EXACTLY THE SAME TIME to produce a completely symmetrical collapse. That’s preposterous, it would require a miracle of coincidence, and I don’t believe in miracles. This building was engineered to collapse.
The whole facade came straight fucking down at EXACTLY FREE FALL for over 2.25 seconds, which means that all the supports disappeared AT THE BASE, not step by step, there was not even accumulating inertia slowing the building down. The collapse was simultaneous, therefore all the columns had to collapse simultaneously. That can’t happen by fire, it requires explosives. Nothing at all can happen to that building by fire, and structural weakness leads to a collapse that looks like WTC 6. Building 7 is a no-brainer, it is obviously, without any analysis a controlled demolition. You have to be a complete idiot to not see through this one.
WTC7 is the finest example of a controlled demolition of a building that size you will find. There are numerous controlled demolition compilations on You Tube for comparison. You won't find one more symmetrical. I'm sure the people who actually pulled it off are very proud or very dead.
>>13319958>>13319960The drills have predictive power, you know which ones are required to pull off a 9/11 style attack, and I looked to see if they happened to exist on 9/11, and THEY DID!! THE DRILLS YOU'D PREDICT ARE CONFIRMED!!
