>>15854068See, what you're doing is just baseless rhetoric with no substance; implying the man in question is a pervert having a perverted interaction with a child by virtue of simply being naked in view of a child. This is what they call 'begging the question'. You're implying a certain intent despite complete lack of context.
>>15854081>and free love nudity shit from the 60s indicates you are a virgin that is just naive and horny.Thanks for proving my point, cutmutt. You literally CANNOT imagine seeing a bare pair of tits at a beach or wherever without turning into a thoughtless coombrained retard to the point where you find it disruptive and physically and emotionally uncomfortable. You are like a little baby. Stunting you like this is why the rabbi gives you the snip, I'm sure.
