>>17129037>No reason to belive your subjective interpretationSo you have no rebuttal whatsoever. Noted.
>Which you presuppose to your favorite flavor of god based kn subjective interpretation. Zero demonstrationIf God is falsifiable, then prove that he's false. If that is impossible, then he is unfalsifiable.
>Enough to call it unfalsifiable which is a logical fallacyAn unfalsifiable truth is not necessarily a logical fallacy
>Nah, it's just that, subjective interpretationYou are unable to even describe the interpretation that you are certain is false. Noted.
>No. I'm not making claims like you.Atheism itself is a claim, unlike the neutrality of agnosticism.