>>17179464>He's the richest man in the worldIncorrect. Picrel is the banker for the Pope.
>He's at least reasonably smartErroneous. Musk is a genius AND an Autist.
>Despite the above, he's a frequent shitposter>He is at least aware of 4chan, and at most a frequent visitor>He apparently cares about free speechAgreed. Definitely. All 3 points. I've seen him too.
>He could probably buy 4chan over breakfast on a fucking whim and run it as a pet project.Unless picrel is behind 4chan, then we're all fucked.
>the site could be highly optimised. Captchas removed, bots removed.I don't consider that any kind of optimization, more of a de-generalized naivete about how systems of cybernetic agreements in a consistently hostile computing environment could actually function in any political system, so long as cybernetics is the norm and never the exception.
That is one hell of a data set to classify and the outrage would be visceral.
>Politically, it could help reinforce free speechThe parasitic niggling of lawyers who studiously avoid Section 230 have been sent study materials.
A single question I sent to one Anon with a Rank as a reward.
The rank is RA(A=n1...n2...n3...) where R = Reverend and (A = Appointees@n1, Anonymous@n2, Admiral@n3...)
You might find that a bit silly, because it is. So was Euler when he rewrote Gravity.
I'm jonesing for a smoke, OP.
Yes, I akshually typed that shit. Not a bot.
