>>16493957Part 1.
>you are supposed to SHOW and PROVE how this is out of context.oh that fine then easy.
We will be consistent and use the Douay-Rheims for both.
Book of Leviticus 23: 1-3
>And the Lord spoke to Moses, saying: [2] Speak to the children of Israel, and thou shalt say to them: These are the feasts of the Lord, which you shall call holy. [3] Six days shall ye do work: the seventh day, because it is the rest of the sabbath, shall be called holy. You shall do no work on that day: it is the sabbath of the Lord in all your habitations. So as I said previously, this is legal code.
No one denies this.
Now lets go back to Song of Songs 1:13
>A bundle of myrrh is my beloved to me, he shall abide between my breasts. Now this is a song and her beloved is not literally a bundle of myrrh.
NEXT!
>The funny part is that you Christians love to ignore.......this is literal cope.
I won't waste time debating what other christians do or do not do.
You are a faggot but I don't point out to other pagans your behavior as evidence paganism is wrong.
>Why are you talking about the book of songs now ?Because we are discussing can the Bible be treated as allegory.
Here I will link the posts
>>16493904>unlike your book of nonsense that even St Augustine said had to be interpreted allegorically and not literally. >>16493910>Anon, I……… please tell me you made this post ironically>>16493918No I am unironically retarded
>>16493924Here I mention
some of it has to be interpreted allegorically, some of it is written IN ALLEGORY
The utter fucking state of reddit atheists.
The Bible is written in multiple styles.
Some is written in allegory.
Some is written in direct literally retelling of events by first had witnesses.
Some of it is written in allegorical PROPHESY, see the book of revelations.
There is 1 book that is literally just legal code.
******Another which is songs.******
>>16493932Here you continue being retarded
>So you admit it's an allegory 