>>18336250The "Monty Hall Problem" is a CIA psyOp. It is cleverly designed to seem plausible enough that people put away their common sense and WILLINGLY CHOOSE to agree with others, rather than appear to be "stupid". The entire purpose is to convince large numbers of intelligent people to put aside what they know to be true, and just join the 'hey those people are retarded, aren't you glad you're not with them?!' bandwagon.
Here's Why:
The solution "it is statistically better to switch doors when asked" is misleading because it is presented in such a way as to seem mathematically objective, rather than statistically subjective. Intelligent people understand just how statistics can be manipulated to convey a narrative not necessarily true....THIS IS JUST THAT.
The fact (facts are objective truths) is that the second probability choice is separate from the first probabaility choice with regards to the contestant, and not with regards to Monty. You see....Monty "HAS TO" open a goat door regardless of the contestants choice. So if the Contestant chooses the car door, the Monty has a choice between the remaining two doors...but he HAS TO open one. If the Contestant chooses a goat door, then Monty has no choice between the doors...he HAS TO open the only door with a goat.
So the fact (objective truth) is that Monty HAS TO reveal a goat door, knows which are goat doors, and HAS TO offer the Contestant the chance to switch doors...Monty is connected between both probabaility choices, not the Contestant. The reason...is because it does not matter what choice happened already....the probabaility choice is between two doors no matter if the first probabaility choice was a car or a goat. So it's 50/50...because the first choice doesn't affect the next one as it relates to the Contestant.
The entire "Monty hall Problem" is designed to play with statistics in such a way as to convince intelligent people to throw away what they know to be true...just to not be ridiculed.
