every scientific theory functions in a way it can be disproven if certain facts or theory come out.
Meanwhile, evolution, while being the current paradigm, seems entirely unfalsifiable (Poppers prerequisite for scientific theory). like the test for real witch - If she dies she is probably a witch, if she survives she isnt.
Example 1: if it survives its more adapted (ergo superior), if it doesnt its less adapted (ergo inferior). That kind of logic should also apply to human races so if whitey dies, he actually wasnt the masterrace, if he survives he actually is. This is mythology and circular reasoning, not scientific reasoning.
Example 2: "useless human body parts". Appendix and wisdom teeth are considered an evolutionary relic...until few years ago when appendix was discovered to be very usefull for keeping gut bacteria. Wisdom teeth? Idk I still have them.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/10/071008102334.htmIn the end theory of evolution doesnt predict anything like a good sci theory should, but explains things backwards.
discuss.
example of pseudoscientific thinking inspired by evolution
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QDoMaPOqi4>>14375326>Chihuahuas exist.even if you are this happy, I dont envy you.
>>14375327>What exact part seems like it's not falsifiable?I just said that not claim about the future is at all falsifiable, its this some gay gotcha thing you are attempting?
>>14375330>In the future we probably won’t even need to type on a keyboard anymore. And it isn’t even crucial now. I can type perfectly fine without using my pinkies.You can type with just your pinky if you want to or live with one kidney, half a lung...what are your scientifically falsifiable hypothesis about the future of evolution?
