>>14358141I know for sure that this scam (picrel) is not gonna be forgotten in a hundred years, and that doesn't make it any more art than a drawing that has been forgotten
and I have some more ideas:
- if time makes art, then there isn't any art being made looking in a daily basis?
- one week ago a mastermind created another masterpiece, but not enough time has passed... that's art or not?
- where's the borderline of how much time is enough to be considered art, and why would (You) be able to say exactly how much?
- if it's not art, what is it? and would that other state be inferior to 'za art'?
- every artist that has lived, and thought that they were doing art was tricked all their life because they weren't doing art? or they were doing something that would in a future be art? or another non-artist just did a dog shit piece and thought 'this is gonna be art in 100 years from now' but never did? how can we differenciate in our existence if what we do is art or not? (by this I think I cannot take your definition ;n;)
also I am not defending animu, I couldn't care less, I just find this shit interesting
