>>10598430>Yes. It's anthropomorphic. All Greco-Roman gods are.NO it's not. Plato explained it. The other story was satire play. And Ovid was a master of wordplay.
It's obviously not true because Lucifer had no character and shouldn't even be capitalized. They did that for you fags and Christians.
>Dates are often encoded in astronomical symbolism. Yes, Lucifer was intended to be an astronomical body.correct, so?
>You have zero evidence for this claim, and if Ovid wanted Lucifer to be Venus he never would have had the character Lucifer at all.There is no character in that story nigger. That's the point. Do you even comprehend what Metamorphoses is about? It's so much deeper than your Christian off-shoots.
